[Warning: Naughty language ahead]
In perusing some of my favorite blogs and some of my friends’ Facebook pages, I have noticed an interesting trend. Many writers, conscious of sexist language, are now using invented gender-neutral pronouns. “Hir” is now used in place of “his/her,” and “zie” is now used in place of “he/she.” This is intended to show sensitivity for people who are transgendered as well as people of either gender.
I like this. It cleverly solves the problem of writing a sentence such as, “Everyone is invited to the party and ____ is encouraged to bring beer,” or “Everyone and ___ mother knows that Darren Criss is the dreamiest actor on TV.” No other word satisfies me. “His” is sexist, “his/her” is awkward, “their” is grammatically incorrect, and “one” is pretentious. I salute and encourage the use of “hir” and “zie” as replacements. I wouldn’t use them in work documents, of course – we’re not there yet – but when blogging, or writing friendly emails or Evites, why not?
Then I started thinking about gender-neutral insults.
Many words we use when talking about people we despise are gendered. Men are “dicks” and “pricks.” Women are “bitches” and “cunts.” Men are also called “pussies” and “wusses” if they act too feminine. To paraphrase Jessica Valenti (mostly from memory and I’m sure I don’t have the exact wording right), “The worst thing you can call a woman is a cunt. The worst thing you can call a man is a pussy. Basically, the worst thing you can call anyone is ‘female.’”
As a feminist, this bothers me. Clearly, there have to be gender-neutral or socially conscious insults available to use when dealing with the jackassery of day-to-day living.
My solution? Everyone’s an asshole.
Usually, the word asshole is reserved for men that are annoying jerks. I call foul on this. Women have assholes as well. If men can be assholes, so can women. If you have two bosses, one male and one female, and they’re equally disagreeable people, don’t call the male boss a “dick” and a female boss a “bitch.” They’re both assholes, because they both have them.
Jerk is also an acceptable word to use for men, women, and disagreeable people who are transgendered. Bill Haverchuck on Freaks and Geeks called Vicki Appleby a jerk when she was condescending to him. It was well-deserved, and she apologized for her less-than-nice behavior. If he had called her a “bitch,” I doubt she would’ve apologized. Calling someone out on hir (see what I did there?) nasty attitude is acceptable enough – why bring gender into it if you don’t have to?
Other acceptable, gender-neutral, and/or socially conscious insults:
Fuckwit (n). Definition: a person who shows lack of intelligence and common sense. Used in place of the offensive term “retard.” Other forms: fuckwittery
Douchebag (n). I like UrbanDictionary’s take (the second definition). Note: a deceptively feminist insult, as douching was an anti-woman practice designed to make women feel ashamed of their bodily odors. Calling someone a douchebag or douche is socially responsible because you are tacitly condemning a sexist practice. Go you!
And let’s not forget older classics: cretin, sleaze, dirtbag, and the like.
Of course, none of those insults roll off the tongue in quite the same way as “cunt.” I know. I understand. Deal with it.
Better yet, take a page from the book of the folks behind “hir” and “zie”: make up your own word! Try it! It’s fun! Bonus points to anyone who makes up a new insult and leaves one in the comments.
I read “assdrip” as an insult somewhere, and I;m working to incorporate that into my insult repertoire.
How about, “Everyone is invited to the party and encouraged to bring beer”? Or “Everyone and their mother knows that you can solve this problem by alternating his and her, and without needing to resort to new words.”
I don’t want to offend turtles, I mean, they are adorable. But they are kinda weak so I use turtle as a replacement for when douchebags would say pussy. I can’t have the spiciest curry today, I’m being such a turtle!
does it really matter? I mean if you are insulting someone there`s no need to be polite, and if so there would be no point to insult someone, its either all or none, to me at least
Keep in mind that I’m partly tongue-in-cheek with this post. But even then – the point is to insult the person’s actions, or to insult the person without attacking the whole [i]group[/i] the person belongs to. If a person of color acts like an asshole, I’m not going to call that person a racial epithet – the person’s race has nothing to do with hir being an asshole. If a disabled person acts like an asshole, I’m not going to call that person a retard – the person’s disability is not related to the assholish behavior. So I’m trying to extend that to sex and gender as well.
once i tried to type ‘douchebag’ and my phone thought i was trying to say ‘doughnut’, so we all said that instead for a long time. haha.
None of the sentences in the second paragraph are grammatically correct if using singular pronouns (i.e. he/she, his/her) because the subject in both sentences is “everyone”. I get your point though, in formal essays where you can’t use personal pronouns like “you, I, me, myself, we, us, our, etc.” you have to use “one”. That gets tricky when you write sentences such as, “If one wishes to bring positive change to the world, ____ should start with ____self.” Usually the tendency is to go with the male pronoun which I guess is sexist. I’m in favour of pronouns that are singular but are still gender neutral for that reason.