I started this blog because I’m always trying to find a balance between the two dominant parts of my personality: the part that loves gallows humor and making jokes about inappropriate subjects, and the part that believes sensitive subjects deserve to be treated with seriousness and empathy.
I recently wrote about a disappointing episode of Community that included a storyline about a character that lied about being molested as a child in order to impress a woman and the people in his acting class. A poster left this comment in response:
“…I found Troy’s plot stupid and standard sitcom, though not actively offensive. I never really connected to it to the doubts thrown up at real-life rape survivors, and thinking about it now, I don’t feel that it. Even what I consider a funny version of the same joke (a throwaway bit in The Office a few years ago) doesn’t make me feel that rape is anything but underreported and that the system makes it very difficult for victims for to be believed, let alone get justice. And I feel uncomfortable with the argument that other people will feel persuaded, or that it’ll give aid and comfort to those who enjoy and benefit from that difficulty.”
To which I say: Yes. And No.
There are plenty of ignorant fuckwits in this world that will misinterpret an author’s intent or misappropriate a text for their own nefarious purposes. There’s no arguing that. At the same time, I do think writers have a moral responsibility to consider how their work contributes to the culture and social consciousness.
To explain further, I’m going to do a little compare and contrast exercise using the latest episode of Community and an episode of a different television show that included a similar plot, but one that I did not find offensive. This was an episode of South Park.
Yes, South Park. Bear with me. Continue reading